Rendered images of the aggregation are
followed by videos on slides fourteen and fifteen of the sticks aligning and
stacking much like bricks to form walls. The jury finally seems interested as they watch the lines pivot back and forth adjusting their relationships.
"How do you simplify this to get more out of the algorithm?" Balmond asks. He is interested in the arrangement of the sticks, and how they could start to construct real walls. Our project is the first to address the materiality of architecture and they want us to take the sticks as far as possible. One by one, the rest of the jury also expresses their interest in the sticks. Rob Stuart-Smith like them so much that he suggests we get rid of the group algorithm completely and focus on the one idea. Removing the people doesn't thrill me at all and luckily Roland sides with me. He believes that with more differentiation based on size or designated activity, the groups can directly inform the stick alignment and the aesthetic of the building. Daniel Bosia, who with Cecil runs the AGU and was one of the first people to apply non-linear design to architecture ends our review excitedly: "picture millions of these little wooden sticks stacked and aligned into a building. " Relieved, Dwight, So and I nod in agreement.
The jury reviews three other projects without interruption. The third and fourth projects have a mixed reception, while the last receives high praise for the complexity of the code. As is typical with architectural reviews, the jury closes with a round of general comments and encouragement--advising that we should continue to tweak our algorithms while working toward a constructible design. On our way out, Bosia stops Dwight, So, and I and once again complementing our work, he asks if we would be willing to do a short presentation for the whole AGU in the morning. We gratefully accept.
No comments:
Post a Comment